geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <>
Subject Re: svn commit: r412426 - in /geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-spec-javamail/src: main/java/javax/mail/internet/ main/java/org/apache/geronimo/mail/util/ test/java/javax/mail/internet/
Date Thu, 08 Jun 2006 17:52:33 GMT
Rick McGuire wrote:
> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>> for a SPEC change (unless there was a bug) it makes more sense for 
>>>> a full point release change and not a dot release.  Dot releases 
>>>> should be limited to bug, stability and performance related 
>>>> improvements.
>>> Which is why I chose to go with 1.1.1.  The changes I just checked 
>>> in are merely bug fixes (and some unit test improvements).
>> This should also mirror the repo organization.  Technically, the 
>> 1.0.1 versions that came from trunk should have been labeled 1.1.0.
>> If you intend to release a patch, you should branch the 1_2 tag and 
>> put your patches in there.  Since this is trunk, it should be labled 
>> 1.20-SNAPSHOT.
> Ok, I'll change it to 1.2.  All of the 1.0.1 versions in the repo 
> certainly pushed me to the conclusion that 1.1.1 was the correct way 
> to go.
That's understandable.  It set a bad precedent.


View raw message