geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Sisson <>
Subject Re: Unit tests coverage - what about rising the bar up to 99,999% ;)
Date Sat, 03 Jun 2006 01:55:08 GMT
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Just before v1.0, the % of code we had covered in our unit test were
> about 30%. I don't know expect that to have gone up significantly
> higher since then.
> Check out this site -

> But I like where you are going with this. To make the product strong
> and robust, I would like  every single individual module to have it's
> own unit test suite. And once we have assembled the modules, we should
> subject the final distribution for system level tests. This is where
> the itests framework (currently waiting in the sandbox) can come in
> handy.
> Ideal candidates for the system level tests would be on the lines of
> tests mentioned in here -
> That is what I  had thought about this and am willing to help in this
> regard (soon after we move to m2).
Looks like there is a new version of the clover plugin for m2 about to 
be released.  The historical reporting sounds interesting.

I am assuming we are talking about doing this in trunk so we can use m2?

> Cheers
> Prasad
> On 6/2/06, Jacek Laskowski <> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Just a thought that sprung to my mind. I must admit that I haven't
>> followed the progress on 1.1 branch carefully enough and most likely
>> lost track. I'm going to get up to speed with the latest whistles and
>> bells and thought to take a look at the unit tests and how much we've
>> got them so far.
>> Has anyone looked at the test unit coverage? Possibly using clover or
>> any other alternative (I should know about)? Is there anyone out there
>> that thought about it too and meant to help out? Please speak up!
>> Jacek
>> -- 
>> Jacek Laskowski

View raw message