geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Jencks (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1492) Many "org/apache/geronimo" configIds still live in source tree
Date Fri, 02 Jun 2006 15:22:30 GMT
    [ ] 

David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1492:

2) There are sections like the one below in many of the files. I'm not convinced this is correct
syntax. Is it legal to list only part of a module name in a module element in a reference?

         <reference name="ServerInfo">
- <module>org/apache/geronimo/System</module>
+ <module>geronimo/j2ee-system</module>

These should simply remove the module element.  Plans with references like these need to have
e.g. in this case j2ee-system in their ancestor set, so its possible that dependencies need
to be added to the plan as well.

> Many "org/apache/geronimo" configIds still live in source tree
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>          Key: GERONIMO-1492
>          URL:
>      Project: Geronimo
>         Type: Bug
>     Security: public(Regular issues) 
>     Versions: 1.0
>     Reporter: Aaron Mulder
>     Priority: Blocker
>      Fix For: 1.1
>  Attachments: GERONIMO-1492.diff, annotated-grep-output.txt
> I created a couple separate issues, but beyond those a quick search brought up a few
more in magic G ball and day trader -- I stopped before it went any further, but we should
grep for that and try to eliminate all the references to old-style config IDs.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message