Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27650 invoked from network); 4 May 2006 05:30:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 May 2006 05:30:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 61131 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2006 05:30:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 60789 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2006 05:30:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 60766 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2006 05:30:38 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 May 2006 22:30:38 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of rakesh.geronimo@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.195] (HELO nz-out-0102.google.com) (64.233.162.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 May 2006 22:30:37 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id q3so383936nzb for ; Wed, 03 May 2006 22:30:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=HIYaV2QwqyAEpJ4+7z8AVxLWb0gjZbCChj492Oqz8lHzKP7IMz29kv5cqwteG1ZvSJKEhWYbYH/Xy7IggETk7M4kCDIUCBXpYgMSjQT4/CrGtfNVjYexJGF6wZukYLR/4HAvWwtBktn5NvUrDJPdPWL43ujkAqFINJ4V25ppU/E= Received: by 10.64.253.17 with SMTP id a17mr119152qbi; Wed, 03 May 2006 22:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.230.7 with HTTP; Wed, 3 May 2006 22:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:00:16 +0530 From: "Rakesh Ranjan" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: hot deployment directory In-Reply-To: <74e15baa0605032211g61c781f7v81f442432d447e92@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_31875_9092121.1146720616889" References: <74e15baa0605032149te19f66ehac7bc3f38c672163@mail.gmail.com> <74e15baa0605032211g61c781f7v81f442432d447e92@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_31875_9092121.1146720616889 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I have seen the same problems with Geronimo-1.1-SNAPSHOT also. So i will create JIRA ID for these two issues and start working. Rakesh Ranjan On 5/4/06, Aaron Mulder wrote: > > Please do any work in the 1.1 branch. Right now 1.2 is in a very > uncertain state. Though, I suspect the issues will be different in > 1.1, so you may want to start by testing the same things there. > > IIRC, the hot deployer does not yet check the timestamp of the > deployments in it its directory during startup and compare those to > the timestamps of the current modules to determine whether an existing > file there is the same as ever or a new version was copied in while > the server was down. That should be doable in 1.1. > > Thanks, > Aaron > > On 5/4/06, Rakesh Ranjan wrote: > > Thanks Aaron for the quick response. > > Here are two issues with Geronimo-1.2-SNAPSHOT which need to be fixed = : > > 1. When Geronimo starts, it try to deploy the modules in the hot > deployment > > directory even if that module is already deployed. Since > the application is > > already deployed, it throws an error : the application already exists i= n > the > > server. > > > > 2. Geronimo is not able to deploy the database plans kept in the hot > > deployment directory. > > > > Rakesh Ranjan > > > > > > On 5/4/06, Aaron Mulder wrote: > > > You're welcome to look at that. Can you list the issues you're going > > > to attempt to fix? There seems to be a lot of variation in what > > > people think the problems actually are. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Aaron > > > > > > On 5/4/06, Rakesh Ranjan < rakesh.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I have not seen much activity in hot deployment directory > enhancement. > > I > > > > have seen there are some bugs in the current implementation of hot > > > > deployment directory. I am interested to work on this enhancement. > So i > > want > > > > to know the current status of this enhancement? Is some other membe= r > > working > > > > on this issue? > > > > > > > > Rakesh > > > > > > > > > > > > ------=_Part_31875_9092121.1146720616889 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I have seen the same problems with Geronimo-1.1-SNAPSHOT also. So i will cr= eate JIRA ID for these two issues and start working.
Rakesh Ranjan

On 5/4/06, Aaron Mulder <ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote: Please do any work in the 1.1 branch.  Right now 1.2 is in a very=
uncertain state.  Though, I suspect the issues will be differ= ent in
1.1, so you may want to start by testing the same things there.
IIRC, the hot deployer does not yet check the timestamp of the
deployments in it its directory during startup and compare those to
= the timestamps of the current modules to determine whether an existing
f= ile there is the same as ever or a new version was copied in while
the s= erver was down.  That should be doable in=20 1.1.

Thanks,
    Aaron

On 5/4/06, Rake= sh Ranjan <rakesh.geronimo@= gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Aaron for the quick response.
&g= t;  Here are two issues with=20 Geronimo-1.2-SNAPSHOT which need to be fixed :
>  1. When G= eronimo starts, it try to deploy the modules in the hot deployment
> = directory even if that module is already deployed. Since the  app= lication is
> already deployed, it throws an error : the application = already exists in the
> server.
>
>  2. Geronimo is not able to depl= oy the database plans kept in the hot
> deployment directory.
>=
>  Rakesh Ranjan
>
>
> On 5/4/06, Aaron = Mulder < ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote:
> > You're welcome to= look at that.  Can you list the issues you're going
> >= to attempt to fix?  There seems to be a lot of variation in what=
> > people think the problems actually are.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >     Aar= on
> >
> > On 5/4/06, Rakesh Ranjan < rakesh.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote:
&g= t; > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >  I have not seen much activi= ty in hot deployment directory enhancement.
> I
> > > hav= e seen there are some bugs in the current implementation of hot
> >= ; > deployment directory. I am interested to work on this enhancement. S= o i
> want
> > > to know the current status of this enhancem= ent? Is some other member
> working
> > > on this issue?<= br>> > >
> > >  Rakesh
> > >
= > >
>
>

------=_Part_31875_9092121.1146720616889--