Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
In-Reply-To: <1b5bfeb50605212349r2d2bddc8u7e13a243bd931f56@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4470FE4D.1090806@Golux.Com>
 <1b5bfeb50605212349r2d2bddc8u7e13a243bd931f56@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <9D497B91-D3A0-4D71-AB9B-09CC30F3C136@jaguNET.com>
Cc: coar@apache.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: Change to commit model for Apache Geronimo
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 09:36:10 -0400
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org


On May 22, 2006, at 2:49 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:

> On 5/22/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.Coar@golux.com> wrote:
>
>> Due to concerns about how some changes have been getting
>> made in the codebase, I am changing the commit model
>> for the time being.
>>
>> Effective immediately, the development model for Apache
>> Geronimo is changed from Commit-Then-Review to
>> Review-Then-Commit.
>
> Not that I don't like the idea as it may eventually help our community
> to understand changes before they get applied and keep up the pace,
> but...
>
> Shouldn't *your* decision be voted as well or at least discussed here
> openly, with the community to find out how they feel about our
> cooperation/openness? What message are we sending out if *you* step
> out and change the rules just like that? Just a thought many could
> have come up with after having read it.
>

Just in case there is any confusion, Ken has the full support of
the board regarding this. I'm saying this with my board hat
on. In true ASF spirit, Ken discussed this with the
board before making any decisions...