Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.184.226 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer;
        b=OJolxflUpRLOy9BHLA8sRvYQlvOXsQXaMTT1ir14P/ICUet8rd0aYUmP7MLPAx26EaXKNfarTfxGVc/bTQc/CpPiY0DaUDA3Yq9bHjP3x2rJtjndIBWMJpgyXVp2L0vcddTLvL3Ls9WMa6XzKQH9gvS8HnzjsN8l6jLoclLQb1s=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3)
In-Reply-To: <331EE4DD-BA1D-4A1D-B37B-3F288B833A27@iq80.com>
References: <445D158B.5080904@hogstrom.org>
 <331EE4DD-BA1D-4A1D-B37B-3F288B833A27@iq80.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <643B0B48-6243-4326-9A81-AE8DCB7C5540@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Thinking about 1.2 and moving forward
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:37:17 -0400
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org


On May 8, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

> +1 to the re-cut trunk plan
>
> I do not want to re-cut trunk, until we have the time to setup  
> gbuild to tck test it, and capacity on gbuild to run it.  We should  
> never be out of compliance again.  It is just to painful to fix later.

+ a bunch... Not only is it painful, but it's also risky -- you don't  
know what issues are going to be found late in the game... It will be  
hard to do this 100% of the time, but we need to find a way to do  
this in reasonable size chunks...
--kevan

>
> -dain
>
> On May 6, 2006, at 2:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> I think we're at the point where 1.1 needs to bake for a bit and  
>> we'll release it in a few weeks. Since I expect that folks will  
>> want to get to putting in new feature and functions for 1.2 I  
>> wanted to kick off a thread to get that discussion going.
>>
>> I'm consolidating here my recollections of discussion on the list  
>> about what to do.  The idea that made the most sense to me was to  
>> move the current trunk to another branch and copy the 1.1 branch  
>> to trunk.  We'd then have people merge their changes from the the  
>> old trunk to the new and start on 1.2.
>>
>> I'm not sure about timing but it might be nice to have this work  
>> done before Java One and the hackathons.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Matt
>