Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <44634613.3070704@hogstrom.org>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:11:31 -0400
From: Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List
References: <4460B881.7090702@hogstrom.org>
 <74e15baa0605090852k79f8669fvafd6e07c3e5319b4@mail.gmail.com>
 <4460C66C.8020503@hogstrom.org>
 <DC9F3B20-37EE-4D1C-BFD4-7AA09F1834E5@gmail.com>
 <4463383F.1020107@optusnet.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <4463383F.1020107@optusnet.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Gianny,

TranQL 1.3 has several performance and feature fixes (thanks to you) that we've been planning on for 
1.1.  I didn't realize the changes to OpenEJB however.  I'd like to get this release wrapped up the 
week after Java One if possible (end of the month).  Can you guesstimate the potential impact?  If 
its destabilizing then perhaps we should defer to G 1.2.  What are your thoughts?

Gianny Damour wrote:
> Kevan Miller wrote:
> 
>>
>> On May 9, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Consolidated list so far is:
>>>
>>> Axis from               1.4-356167      to      1.4
>>> commons-fileupload    1.1-dev        to    1.1
>>> jasper from             5.5.9           to      5.5.15
>>> Jetty from              5.1.9           to      5.1.10
>>> stax from               1.1.1-dev       to      1.1.2
>>> Tomcat             5.5.9        to    5.5.15
>>> tranql  from            1.2.1           to      1.3-SNAPSHOT
>>> tranql-connector from   1.1             to      1.2-SNAPSHOT
>>
>>
>> We're already on Tomcat 5.5.15, but fine to keep it on the list.
>>
>> I assume the final tranql and tranql-connector versions will be 1.3  
>> and 1.2. We'll use the SNAPSHOT versions until a new tranql release  
>> is published (which will happen before we ship 1.1...).
> 
> As a matter of fact, an upgrade to TranQL 1.3 requires some code changes 
> to OpenEJB (repackaging). Also, it would be nice to port dynamic queries 
> from trunk to 1.1. If there is no objection, I propose to do that this 
> week-end and ensure that this does not break the tck.
> 
> Thanks,
> Gianny
> 
>>
>> I'll start testing these versions once we clean up a few problems.
>>
>> --kevan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>