Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of davanum@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.202 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Rj1Jc+8wT/+01zyBDUyDO/kgLwHUyu8twGeESjTyLjXW1V/4CFYz9UWcOeVxIe7TkkUAdHd/0MGyuwqIh6WZAWf2+52TeWgvHKK33xin0SJ+HQmArM6b1t3sI7/S7cFiLHef5I6uynbiAAniN1Xdi63pYheKFn59Ymw45COzH7c=
Message-ID: <19e0530f0605251126r63ab178dn4e54634bc5f187ec@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:26:13 -0400
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <davanum@gmail.com>
Reply-To: dims@apache.org
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Creating a separate mailing list for XBean?
In-Reply-To: <91FBC87A-3783-49CA-B5AD-DE9ED3B7C5EE@iq80.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <ec6e67fd0605250154h5ca5cca8ndddb607e7258954d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4475AFDE.2070205@Golux.Com>
	 <91FBC87A-3783-49CA-B5AD-DE9ED3B7C5EE@iq80.com>

My 2 cents, If we switch over BigG as outlined in the Jan 29th email
from Dain [1] in the next few months(?)/year(?), then we should just
move XBean outside of BigG as a separate project.

thanks,
dims

[1] http://marc2.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dgeronimo-dev&m=3D113856069605418&w=
=3D2

On 5/25/06, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
> I agree with both of you.  I agree with James that XBean is getting
> close to needing it's own mailing list (I don't think it is there
> yet, but I can see what prompted the request).  I with Ken that when
> XBean gets to the point of needing a separate mailing list it should
> start the transition to becoming a separate project.
>
> My guess is XBean will make a turn to become a standalone in the next
> 6 months or it will get settle into just another subproject of
> Geronimo.  I'm curious to see how it will all shake out.  :)
>
> -dain
>
> On May 25, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > James Strachan wrote:
> >>
> >> So I was wondering; maybe we should create mailing lists for XBean
> >> and
> >> then it becomes effectively a new subproject with its own identity.
> >>
> >> Given the slow release cycles of Geronimo, XBean could end up being
> >> the cool & trendy young sister project, releasing often which could
> >> innovate and help gain traction faster which, given that stuff that
> >> works in XBean will ultimately work great in Geronimo too is a win-
> >> win
> >> alround.
> >
> > If XBean is as separate as all that, it should be its own project
> > and not part of Geronimo.  Separate codebase, separate Web pages,
> > separate mailing lists, and probably separate JIRA.. then there's
> > no point in misleading ourselves that it's part of Geronimo.
> >
> > So as long as it *is* part of Geronimo, it has to at least
> > share the Geronimo mailing lists.  Balkanisation has been found
> > here to be definitely counterproductive.
> > - --
> > #ken  P-)}
> >
> > Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
> > Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/
> >
> > "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> >
> > iQCVAwUBRHWv3prNPMCpn3XdAQJZxgP8DegCWpLEQksRcQ+HKfPBUsxQAL9QQGoH
> > /7m/RKrm3iKTY7c9HWozyzS5PZhmFxk/GIJ6LTBWUxQa41m2AXUxbKY/NU/iC2A6
> > O9nKFbpOVh0Rrf8kKnr1qHSeuCFSwkdkO188kG9Ffux6T8RZ7QsZgD/a+oqfWxer
> > NJ3e20Gjksk=3D
> > =3DHn7w
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>


--=20
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/