geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geron...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re-migration to m2 - status and discussion.
Date Fri, 26 May 2006 03:06:58 GMT
Did you forget to attach the patch or did you mean you were going to attach it ?

Here's the latest top level pom.xml with the version changes.

Cheers
Prasad

On 5/25/06, anita kulshreshtha <a_kulshre@yahoo.com> wrote:
>    I am attaching a patch for 1.2. I finally built 'modules' with M1 on
> the trunk(The PluginInstallerTest failed). This patch builds, but I had
> to skip tests. See pom.xml in modules. Jetty module can not find needed
> jars. What version changes were made recently?
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
> --- Prasad Kashyap <goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I was able to apply the same patch on linux. Wonder why not on
> > windows ?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Prasad
> >
> > On 5/25/06, Prasad Kashyap <goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Anita,
> > >
> > > I'm unable to apply your modules.patch using TortoiseSVN on XP.
> > >
> > > I first get a pop-up which says, "{g_path}/modules/tomcat/pom.xml
> > has
> > > no URL." It then tries to retrieve version 0 of file. That fails
> > and
> > > it says, "patching not possible"
> > >
> > > Am I doing anything wrong here ?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Prasad
> > >
> > > On 5/25/06, anita kulshreshtha <a_kulshre@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > inline..
> > > >
> > > > --- Prasad Kashyap <goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Anita, that is okay with me.
> > > > >
> > > > > So we shall continue to use the old JIRA G-851.
> > > > >
> > > > > You now seem to have a uber patch, one each for the modules and
> > > > > configs. This, I believe, will contain the different patches
> > that we
> > > > > submitted for the individual modules and configs.
> > > > >
> > > > > You may attach those modules.patch and config.patch to the
> > G-851
> > > > > jira.
> > > > > I shall attach a similar uber patch for the applications in the
> > same
> > > > > jira.
> > > >    I will rebuild the patches against the trunk. I am still
> > trying to
> > > > get an m1 build for the trunk.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The pom.patch from your G-1740 couldn't be applied because the
> > > > > pom.xml
> > > > > had changed in G-2053. Just fyi. You may want to redo that
> > pom.patch
> > > > > or I can submit the changes I made.
> > > >
> > > >      If you have the latest dependency versions, you can submit
> > the
> > > > patch. I only added few o.a.g.modules and and o.a.g.plugins
> > > > dependencies and few missing dependency versions.
> > > >
> > > > Thnaks
> > > > Anita
> > > > >
> > > > > We could go ahead from there on.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanx
> > > > > Prasad
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/25/06, anita kulshreshtha <a_kulshre@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > > inline..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- Prasad Kashyap <goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now that we have a new 1.2 trunk, we can go ahead migrating
> > the
> > > > > build
> > > > > > > to m2 (again).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A recap:
> > > > > > > ------------
> > > > > > > 1. The build in the old trunk was migrated to m2. It can
be
> > found
> > > > > > > here
> > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/branches/dead-1.2/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. The old migration JIRA was under the JIRA G-851.
> > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3. The migration status can be found here
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Migration+Status
> > > > > > >  - All the modules (with their tests) were successfully
> > migrated.
> > > > > > >  - All the applications (with their tests) were
> > successfully
> > > > > > > migrated.
> > > > > > >  - I believe some of the configs were migrated (Anita ?).
> > > > > > >  - The deployment and packaging plugins were migrated.
> > > > > >     The configs and plugin patch was never applied, because
> > we had
> > > > > > decided to wait for the merge.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So now, we should starting porting those changes back again
> > into
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > new trunk.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jacek, should we open a new JIRA on the lines on 851 or
> > should we
> > > > > > > continue to work with 851 ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Most of the patches with 851 can be re-applied as is
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  but should be
> > > > > > > only after a careful screening. So continuing the same
JIRA
> > seems
> > > > > > > okay.
> > > > > >     I agree, it will be easier to refer to the old problems
> > > > > encountered
> > > > > > during the migration.
> > > > > >     A lot of dependencies were moved around in 1.1, so the
> > old
> > > > > patches
> > > > > > to 851 are not likely to work as is. I had transported all
> > the
> > > > > modules
> > > > > > from 1.2 to 1.1. I did lot of dependency pruning after that.
> > I
> > > > > needed
> > > > > > most of the modules to test the plugin. If it is ok with you,
> > I
> > > > > would
> > > > > > like to submit a patch for that. I think the applications
> > should
> > > > > work
> > > > > > as is.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Anita
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > OTH, we  may want to start afresh with a clean slate and
> > not add
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > the clutter of the old JIRA. In this case, we will have
to
> > > > > reattach
> > > > > > > the latest patches from the old JIRA to the new JIRA.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am okay either which way.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > > > Prasad.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
> > around
> > > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

Mime
View raw message