geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geron...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re-migration to m2 - status and discussion.
Date Thu, 25 May 2006 21:00:07 GMT
Anita,

I'm unable to apply your modules.patch using TortoiseSVN on XP.

I first get a pop-up which says, "{g_path}/modules/tomcat/pom.xml has
no URL." It then tries to retrieve version 0 of file. That fails and
it says, "patching not possible"

Am I doing anything wrong here ?

Cheers
Prasad

On 5/25/06, anita kulshreshtha <a_kulshre@yahoo.com> wrote:
> inline..
>
> --- Prasad Kashyap <goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Anita, that is okay with me.
> >
> > So we shall continue to use the old JIRA G-851.
> >
> > You now seem to have a uber patch, one each for the modules and
> > configs. This, I believe, will contain the different patches that we
> > submitted for the individual modules and configs.
> >
> > You may attach those modules.patch and config.patch to the G-851
> > jira.
> > I shall attach a similar uber patch for the applications in the same
> > jira.
>    I will rebuild the patches against the trunk. I am still trying to
> get an m1 build for the trunk.
>
> >
> > The pom.patch from your G-1740 couldn't be applied because the
> > pom.xml
> > had changed in G-2053. Just fyi. You may want to redo that pom.patch
> > or I can submit the changes I made.
>
>      If you have the latest dependency versions, you can submit the
> patch. I only added few o.a.g.modules and and o.a.g.plugins
> dependencies and few missing dependency versions.
>
> Thnaks
> Anita
> >
> > We could go ahead from there on.
> >
> > Thanx
> > Prasad
> >
> > On 5/25/06, anita kulshreshtha <a_kulshre@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > inline..
> > >
> > > --- Prasad Kashyap <goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Now that we have a new 1.2 trunk, we can go ahead migrating the
> > build
> > > > to m2 (again).
> > > >
> > > > A recap:
> > > > ------------
> > > > 1. The build in the old trunk was migrated to m2. It can be found
> > > > here
> > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/branches/dead-1.2/
> > > >
> > > > 2. The old migration JIRA was under the JIRA G-851.
> > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851
> > > >
> > > > 3. The migration status can be found here
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Migration+Status
> > > >  - All the modules (with their tests) were successfully migrated.
> > > >  - All the applications (with their tests) were successfully
> > > > migrated.
> > > >  - I believe some of the configs were migrated (Anita ?).
> > > >  - The deployment and packaging plugins were migrated.
> > >     The configs and plugin patch was never applied, because we had
> > > decided to wait for the merge.
> > > >
> > > > So now, we should starting porting those changes back again into
> > the
> > > > new trunk.
> > > >
> > > > Jacek, should we open a new JIRA on the lines on 851 or should we
> > > > continue to work with 851 ?
> > > >
> > > > Most of the patches with 851 can be re-applied as is
> > >
> > >
> > >  but should be
> > > > only after a careful screening. So continuing the same JIRA seems
> > > > okay.
> > >     I agree, it will be easier to refer to the old problems
> > encountered
> > > during the migration.
> > >     A lot of dependencies were moved around in 1.1, so the old
> > patches
> > > to 851 are not likely to work as is. I had transported all the
> > modules
> > > from 1.2 to 1.1. I did lot of dependency pruning after that. I
> > needed
> > > most of the modules to test the plugin. If it is ok with you, I
> > would
> > > like to submit a patch for that. I think the applications should
> > work
> > > as is.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Anita
> > >
> > > >
> > > > OTH, we  may want to start afresh with a clean slate and not add
> > to
> > > > the clutter of the old JIRA. In this case, we will have to
> > reattach
> > > > the latest patches from the old JIRA to the new JIRA.
> > > >
> > > > I am okay either which way.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Prasad.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

Mime
View raw message