geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Dillon" <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: 1.1 Final Items
Date Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:30:01 GMT
Why 2 versions of TranQL?

--jason


On 5/31/06, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> Here are the outstanding issues and my proposed plans to finish 1.1.
>
> Currently there are 124 JIRAs out there for 1.1.  There are also 7 or 8 blockers.  I
have not seen
> any activity on these items in the last week so I'm assuming that there is no resource
to fix them.
>
> I propose that tomorrow I'll move the JIRA's in 1.1 to 1.2 and for those items that are
considered
> hot and people want to work on them they can move them to the 1.1.1 release.  I'll do
this through a
> bulk change.
>
> The remaining items are:
>
> Convert remaining SNAPSHOTs to releases.  Here is the remaining list of items:
>
> activemq_version=3.2.4-SNAPSHOT
> geronimo_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
> openejb_version=2.1-SNAPSHOT
> tranql_version=1.2-SNAPSHOT
> tranql_version=1.3-SNAPSHOT
> geronimo_spec_corba_version=1.0-SNAPSHOT
> geronimo_spec_j2ee_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
> geronimo_spec_javamail_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
> geronimo_spec_jcache_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
> daytrader_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>
> I will convert DayTrader and TranQL after the final set of stress testing.
>
> Any volunteers to convert the specs?  (Alan :)
>
> Kevan, we'll need you to sign off on the activemq versions.
>
> When the above is complete I suggest we get a final test from Kevan and cut a proposed
1.1 for Friday.
>
> If that's good (or if there are only minor fixes) we'll push 1.1 out next week and then
move on to
> 1.2 and beyond.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Matt
>

Mime
View raw message