geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Dillon" <>
Subject Re: Naming conventions for branches
Date Mon, 22 May 2006 21:16:09 GMT
I forget who said it... but I'm gonna bet that if we skip 1.2, that it
will just confuse people.

So, here is my -1, to effectively skipping 1.2 by making it a dead branch.

I don't see any reason why we can not continue using 1.2-SNAPSHOT for
the soon to be trunk and call the current soon to be replaced as
1.2-DEAD or something along those lines... or if this really is dead
code then delete it as Geir suggested.

I don't think that skipping 1.2 as an official release target for G is
a good idea.


On 5/22/06, Matt Hogstrom <> wrote:
> To make sure we're all on the same page here is a suggested naming convention for the
build environment:
> 1.1 - Current release we're working on
> 1.2 - dead version of what's currently in trunk
> 1.3 - what will be coming on Wednesday morning assuming there are no -1s
> So far all votes have been +1 and I think using the above version numbers will avoid
> during the transition period.

View raw message