geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <>
Subject Re: Session API in 1.1 trunk?
Date Mon, 22 May 2006 18:58:31 GMT
To clarify,
+1 on new trunk after 1.1 is branched
-1 on inclusion in 1.1 release.

I actually don't understand why a vote on this is required.  My  
understanding is that we have all already agreed that all new stuff  
in current trunk is part of future geronimo and the only question is  
when to merge it back into the new 1.1-based trunk.  This is already  
work we have approved of by commit-then-review, why does it need to  
be voted on?

david jencks

On May 22, 2006, at 10:13 AM, David Jencks wrote:

> I'm fine with it going into trunk after 1.1 is branched.  I'm not  
> at all fine with it going into 1.1 and getting released in 1.1: I  
> don't think we should release an api that has not been  proved to  
> work well.
> thanks
> david jencks
> On May 22, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>> We have an initial swipe at some clustering to put into the  
>> sandbox, but
>> will have a need for the session api ;-)
>> Anyone have issue with putting the session API in 1.1 (the new trunk
>> version that is)? (Need 3 +1s)
>> Jeff

View raw message