+1 to merge it to the new trunk.
-0.5 to merge it into 1.1... I don't see any ready to move it into
1.1. There are no users or implementations yet. If someone writes
one for 1.1, they can ship a plugin containing the session apis.
-dain
On May 22, 2006, at 10:13 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I'm fine with it going into trunk after 1.1 is branched. I'm not
> at all fine with it going into 1.1 and getting released in 1.1: I
> don't think we should release an api that has not been proved to
> work well.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On May 22, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>
>> We have an initial swipe at some clustering to put into the
>> sandbox, but
>> will have a need for the session api ;-)
>>
>> Anyone have issue with putting the session API in 1.1 (the new trunk
>> version that is)? (Need 3 +1s)
>>
>> Jeff
|