geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gianny Damour <gianny.dam...@optusnet.com.au>
Subject Re: Remaining 1.1 Issues
Date Tue, 23 May 2006 11:24:47 GMT
Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> Based on the list below I think 1,2 and 3 are new function and 4 is a 
> bug fix.
>
> Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
>> Here are the things that I still want to squeeze into 1.1:
>> - fix console JMS to accept new providers at runtime
>> - fix console security realms to accept new providers at runtime
>> - add a missing Geronimo security provider to console security realms
>> - fix hot deploy dir so it notices files updated while the server was
>> down and deletes files if they are undeployed some other way
>>
>> There are also AFAIK a number of not-yet-applied patches to review.
>
>
> Yes, there are several.
>
> I'm testing some performance related code.  I'm waiting and hoping 
> Codehaus comes up soon :)

I think that I will give some heads up: I am also waiting for Codehaus 
to be back on line to apply an OpenEJB patch related to GERONIMO-1545 
(infamous CASE WHEN ? THEN ? ELSE ). The patch does not break the tck.

Thanks,
Gianny

>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>    Aaron
>>
>>
>>
>
>



Mime
View raw message