geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <>
Subject Re: Session API in 1.1 trunk?
Date Mon, 22 May 2006 18:41:54 GMT
Let me make myself clear from my original message, since I think there
is confusion as to what I was asking:

When I referred to 1.1, I placed into parenthesis, "the new trunk
version that is".

I only have intentions of it going into *some* trunk, assuming it will
be the newly branded trunk based on 1.1.  I did not want to build this
off of 1.2-dead for obvious reasons.

I do *not* at all mean that this should go in the 1.1 release, and I
would -1 that myself...I just want it in the new trunk when its cut.


Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> +1 to merge it to the new trunk.
> -0.5 to merge it into 1.1... I don't see any ready to move it into 1.1. 
> There are no users or implementations yet.  If someone writes one for
> 1.1, they can ship a plugin containing the session apis.
> -dain
> On May 22, 2006, at 10:13 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>> I'm fine with it going into trunk after 1.1 is branched.  I'm not at
>> all fine with it going into 1.1 and getting released in 1.1: I don't
>> think we should release an api that has not been  proved to work well.
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>> On May 22, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>>> We have an initial swipe at some clustering to put into the sandbox, but
>>> will have a need for the session api ;-)
>>> Anyone have issue with putting the session API in 1.1 (the new trunk
>>> version that is)? (Need 3 +1s)
>>> Jeff

View raw message