geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.C...@Golux.Com>
Subject Re: Moving on from 1.1
Date Mon, 22 May 2006 14:22:23 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> 
> -1 for the name - oldtrunk.
> 
> I simply think it doesn't convey any meaning - oldtrunk or to put it
> straight - it won't very soon. We all know what it means/contains now,
> but what about the coming months? I think at some point we forget what
> it was about.  Having said this, I think we should either set a
> timeframe before it gets dropped or apply a better name, e.g.
> geronimo/branches/1.2.
> 
> ...after some time of thinking...
> 
> Yeah, why couldn't it be named - 1.2? Since it's in branches and noone
> will work in it it doesn't impose any threat to our thinking it's
> active or so.

- From past experience, though, I can tell you that there
*will* be requests for 'the 1.2 release.'  People are
endlessly inventive, and trying to figure out why they
do things will keep you very busy for a very long time.

Maybe '1.2-dead' or '1.2-aborted' or '1.2-abandoned'?
- --
#ken	P-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBRHHJH5rNPMCpn3XdAQIinAQAygNtwKDH/rcsMMTU8Y6qDGaqNT0/TotH
v02JSuZWLVcjcso3DjAfxtT6y3d+oXvGmWtwVJjwhmU7cTXl0U5myHMGIge6K1jf
r9emGMdm4Qibh6jYOFSBwm2Wrd7aLb7iIbeQz6j8ueQ0ARfMZyJ2uU74GCVGA8PM
5/xwPTpbmGQ=
=7Fum
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message