geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bohn <joe.b...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: Moving on from 1.1
Date Mon, 22 May 2006 13:02:32 GMT
+1 for copy 1.1 to trunk

+1 for David's recommendation on the name, geronimo/branches/1.2-dead

David Jencks wrote:
> +1 for copy of 1.1 to trunk.
> 
> I'm +0 with oldtrunk but...
> 
> 
> On May 21, 2006, at 11:38 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> 
>> On 5/22/06, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to make the following changes to the dev tree for  
>>> Geronimo.  Assuming there is
>>> concurrence and no objections I would like to:
>>>
>>>   move geronimo/trunk to geronimo/branches/oldtrunk
>>
>>
>> +1 for the idea of establishing a fresh trunk out of 1.1 branch, but
>> -1 for the name - oldtrunk.
>>
>> I simply think it doesn't convey any meaning - oldtrunk or to put it
>> straight - it won't very soon. We all know what it means/contains now,
>> but what about the coming months? I think at some point we forget what
>> it was about.  Having said this, I think we should either set a
>> timeframe before it gets dropped or apply a better name, e.g.
>> geronimo/branches/1.2.
>>
>> ...after some time of thinking...
>>
>> Yeah, why couldn't it be named - 1.2? Since it's in branches and noone
>> will work in it it doesn't impose any threat to our thinking it's
>> active or so. It should not hurt our community either. Some branches
>> are active and finish with something concrete whereas some not. If
>> there're some brave souls who will want to spend some time polishing
>> it out (for some unknown purposes) that's their choice.
> 
> 
> I think this would be kind of misleading.  How about 1.2-dead to  
> indicate that we don't plan to release it?
> 
> thanks
> david jencks
> 
>>
>>>   Matt
>>
>>
>> Jacek
>>
>> -- 
>> Jacek Laskowski
>> http://www.laskowski.net.pl
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Joe Bohn
joe.bohn at earthlink.net

"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot 
lose."   -- Jim Elliot

Mime
View raw message