geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.C...@Golux.Com>
Subject Re: Questions about www.geronimoplugins.com site
Date Tue, 02 May 2006 17:05:45 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Aaron Mulder wrote:
> I thought the point of this thread was to have a discussion?  Please,
> let's not have any more votes, let's have a discussion.  Can you 
> describe your position?

In the meantime, two people have invoked the 'review' part of
commit-then-review and expressed vetos.  Vetos need to have
technical justification and this is a grey area -- is this
a technical thing or a philosophical one? -- but in the
interest of amity I'm going to rule it's a technical one.
Please revert the look-elsewhere-by-default change until
this is settled.

> I think it makes perfect sense to move documentation and tutorials to
>  the Geronimo/Confluence/Apache site.  But my understanding of the 
> Apache distribution rules is that no code not developed at Apache can
>  be distributed by the Apache infrastructure.

Correct.

> To be as inclusive as possible of non-Apache BSD, GPL, and commercial
> plugins, I think the primary plugin repository needs to be separate.

This is part of the issue.  The other part is making the change
without discussion.  Which, under CTR, is fine -- but the 'review'
aspect has been activated and lazy consensus no longer applies.
- --
#ken	P-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBRFeRaZrNPMCpn3XdAQLUfwP9G7KBJKQ7+fKuinOiEaaZI9VouqCpLb0b
hYTHNBBMlhbtLiyYeMtnuwNn3VknycwwDIvr827yoVM52ifj2fQ4Tcq93cKx/srW
ITrqBaoDfUTqJtaygID6C8ysebDuh+MTo6VRKyeCch7KnEA7dwoasREuUUirLOYw
TTAHd9aaHXk=
=jbh8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message