geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexei Zakharov" <alexei.zakha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
Date Thu, 11 May 2006 13:09:55 GMT
BTW, Alex, are there plans to propagate ADS jars to maven1 repo?
Geronimo 1.1 currently supports maven1 only.

Thanks,

2006/5/6, Alexei Zakharov <alexei.zakharov@gmail.com>:
> Alex,
>
> Oh, I've been searching in old "directory" and "directory-network"
> groups rather than "org/apache/directory/server/apacheds-core". Thank
> you for pointing the right group id.
>
> 2006/5/5, Alex Karasulu <aok123@bellsouth.net>:
> > Alexei Zakharov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have created a patch to move the G directory module to ApacheDS 1.0
> > > RC2. But I didn't find necessary 1.0 RCx jars at ibiblio neither at
> > > /maven nor at /maven2. The most recent version is 0.9.3. The same
> > > situation for MINA. So I can't post the patch right now since it will
> > > not work without these jars.
> > > Alex, I just want to let you know about this situation.
> > >
> > Hmmm I'm seeing the RC2 jars just fine.  Take a look here at the core
> > jar for example:
> >
> > http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/server/apacheds-core/1.0-RC2/
> >
> > Also MINA stuff is here:
> >
> > http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/mina/mina-core/0.9.4/
> >
> > HTH,
> > Alex
> >
> >
> > > 2006/4/24, Alex Karasulu <aok123@bellsouth.net>:
> > >> Aaron Mulder wrote:
> > >> > I know 0.9.3 is there (in the /maven2 repo).  Not sure about the RC's.
> > >> >
> > >> Ya all including RC1 should be in the M2 repo if not let me know.
> > >>
> > >> Alex
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> >      Aaron
> > >> >
> > >> > On 4/24/06, Jeff Genender <jgenender@savoirtech.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Alex,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Can you get the jars in ibiblio and I can get the integration
> > >> going?  I
> > >> >> am only seeing 0.9.2 in ibiblio at the moment.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Jeff
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> Jeff Genender wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it.  Alex,
are the
> > >> >>>> updates significant?
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>> Since 0.9.2 I'd say RC1 is a significant update.  There are
> > >> package name
> > >> >>> changes to comply with Directory's TLP domain name which are
> > >> perhaps the
> > >> >>> most significant changes.  There are changes to a couple
> > >> dependencies.
> > >> >>> For the most part the code has been cleaned up and several
> > >> *severe* bugs
> > >> >>> have been corrected and tested.  RC1 is also an order of
> > >> magnitude faster.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> We plan to get another 1.0 release candidate (RC2) out soon
> > >> perhaps by
> > >> >>> the end of this week coming week or week there after.  But
> > >> looking at
> > >> >>> emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like
the
> > >> update to
> > >> >>> G can take place any time after the 1.1 release.  Let us know
if you
> > >> >>> have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade
> > >> either to
> > >> >>> RC1 or RC2 when it comes out.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Regards,
> > >> >>> Alex

-- 
Alexei Zakharov,
Intel Middleware Product Division

Mime
View raw message