geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Davanum Srinivas" <dava...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Session API in 1.1 trunk?
Date Mon, 22 May 2006 18:53:33 GMT
+1 from me.

On 5/22/06, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
> Jeff, I believe you get to vote also, so you had three before alan
> voted (although david didn't put an official "+1" in the email).   :)
>
> Ken, please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> -dain
>
> On May 22, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>
> > Let me follow this up too with some support...
> >
> > JIRA GERONIMO-2046 is a patch (by Bill Dudney) for the first swipe at
> > full replication using the session API.  I want to apply the patch to
> > place the code into the sandbox, but I need the session API available.
> > We will need it in the new trunk, and thus was asking that it be
> > merged
> > for the new trunk from 1.2, so that we may push forward with this
> > first
> > swipe, since its a dependency.
> >
> > I hope that helps.
> >
> > I think I have 2 +1s (Dain and DJ)...need one more ;-)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > Jeff Genender wrote:
> >> Let me make myself clear from my original message, since I think
> >> there
> >> is confusion as to what I was asking:
> >>
> >> When I referred to 1.1, I placed into parenthesis, "the new trunk
> >> version that is".
> >>
> >> I only have intentions of it going into *some* trunk, assuming it
> >> will
> >> be the newly branded trunk based on 1.1.  I did not want to build
> >> this
> >> off of 1.2-dead for obvious reasons.
> >>
> >> I do *not* at all mean that this should go in the 1.1 release, and I
> >> would -1 that myself...I just want it in the new trunk when its cut.
> >>
> >> Jeff
> >>
> >> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> >>> +1 to merge it to the new trunk.
> >>>
> >>> -0.5 to merge it into 1.1... I don't see any ready to move it
> >>> into 1.1.
> >>> There are no users or implementations yet.  If someone writes one
> >>> for
> >>> 1.1, they can ship a plugin containing the session apis.
> >>>
> >>> -dain
> >>>
> >>> On May 22, 2006, at 10:13 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I'm fine with it going into trunk after 1.1 is branched.  I'm
> >>>> not at
> >>>> all fine with it going into 1.1 and getting released in 1.1: I
> >>>> don't
> >>>> think we should release an api that has not been  proved to work
> >>>> well.
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks
> >>>> david jencks
> >>>>
> >>>> On May 22, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> We have an initial swipe at some clustering to put into the
> >>>>> sandbox, but
> >>>>> will have a need for the session api ;-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Anyone have issue with putting the session API in 1.1 (the new
> >>>>> trunk
> >>>>> version that is)? (Need 3 +1s)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jeff
>
>


-- 
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/

Mime
View raw message