geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: Moving on from 1.1
Date Mon, 22 May 2006 22:21:33 GMT
+1

-dain

On May 22, 2006, at 2:36 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> +1
>
> --jason
>
>
> On 5/22/06, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>> Jason replied on another thread that he prefers to stay with 1.2  
>> for the release.
>>
>> Here is the proposed nomenclature
>>
>> trunk           (stays 1.2 but is completely replaced with  
>> branches/1.1)
>> branches/1.1    unchanged
>> branches/dead-1.2 (is  a copy of the original trunk)
>>
>> I think that incorporates the thinking so far.  I like it.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> > I would like to make the following changes to the dev tree for
>> > Geronimo.  Assuming there is concurrence and no objections I  
>> would like to:
>> >
>> >  move geronimo/trunk to geronimo/branches/oldtrunk
>> >  copy geronimo/branches/1.1 to geronimo/trunk
>> >  Update trunk to version 1.3.  I think 1.3 is a better choice to  
>> avoid
>> > any confusion over our old 1.2
>> >
>> >  I'll plan to do this on Wednesday morning at 0300 PT.
>> >
>> >  Other thoughts welcome.
>> >
>> >  Matt
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>


Mime
View raw message