Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31635 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2006 17:33:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2006 17:33:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 77841 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2006 17:33:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 77794 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2006 17:33:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 77783 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2006 17:33:37 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:33:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ammulder@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.181] (HELO pproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.166.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:33:36 -0700 Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t32so1124737pyc for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:33:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AnbqtPRq0ZrRLCPfLEKV4AUHi0GFognTiEVXZY8eJfN3koOyXNbJCjCfpGaGIOX4rHl7Ej1U3TEWnmXuohwJp8B6FIvI4IPvERM8BNUsbcORkMaqU30OntXvlL4sGldaO99EI3bwBgI3oiUOdcjBBMh04EGm95bHxm0ePcBTTWo= Received: by 10.35.82.15 with SMTP id j15mr844109pyl; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.116.1 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <74e15baa0604101033k2e82d0afj214d1e14cb2f7c8b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:33:14 -0400 From: "Aaron Mulder" Sender: ammulder@gmail.com To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Merging from 1.1 to HEAD In-Reply-To: <443A74C2.1000703@hogstrom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <74e15baa0604081706y1e199bf5g8e328310ea1f4d15@mail.gmail.com> <443A74C2.1000703@hogstrom.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I vote we plan to freeze on a Monday rather than a Friday, so we get the weekend to cram in the last bits. :) I know there are a still ton of JIRAs with my name on them for 1.1. I'm a little worried that there have been some showstopper bugs in 1.1 that were only found and addressed in the last few days, but I guess we have some time after the freeze to stabilize and we'll see what the TCK reports as far as the main J2EE features go. As far as what I want to merge in from HEAD, the new keystore portlet and the configuration import/export features -- it's all in that one JIRA of "stuff to merge from HEAD to 1.1". Thanks, Aaron On 4/10/06, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > I was travelling yesterday so apologies for the late reply. > > > > Aaron Mulder wrote: > > So I'm putting some stuff into 1.1, some of which is related to config > > IDs and some of which is not. > > > > My question is, for the stuff unrelated to config IDs, should I be > > merging to HEAD right away? Or is it going to be easier if I don't > > and we merge "everything" at once later? > > > > I have also previously put some things into HEAD which I would like to > > get into 1.1. I assume I should merge those to 1.1 soon, because I > > expect we will prepare the 1.1 release before attempting to fully > > merge 1.1 into HEAD. Is that right? > > Move them sooner than later. The original plan was to freeze code on Fri= day. We would then work > the stable branch to CTS compliance and if there was time left layer in o= ther stuff. I really, > really want to get this out by April 28th so that when Java One rolls aro= und we aren't locked up in > a hotel room trying to get a release done. If it is risky please defer i= t. > > What were the specific features you were looking at ? > > > Thanks, > > Aaron > > > > > > >