Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=b1snNyVgbr+cYj7ZzmUhHAEbiOKqjzqJT23qsdC2jcwHQ9gQlgKv4Tr+jKNMNbJ6M0yOSJIPKjvxxwMXBvoESm4XPE0zd5VbpKJuFaUZ3nGR9NKNsJqS0uv3rHHe0mIE5WY0QSCRKTF4i84a7E4e/8jwl5gy/LSGopN5CpnF9+Y=
  ;
Message-ID: <20060419135103.66276.qmail@web31714.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: anita kulshreshtha <a_kulshre@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: m2 conversion : configurations
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <78637CCB-C46A-4E08-9B0B-F29BB103ED9B@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

    Thanks. What criteria has been used to set the geronimo.dependency
property in project.xml? The packaging of most configurations assumes
the packaged configuration will be loaded on top of j2ee-system
configuration. But the 'applications' configurations implicitly assume
that a full server, i.e jetty/tomcat is running. Is this correct? If
yes, Should we add these configurations (specified by deploymnetConfig)
to the plans for documentation? Is this information stored in
config.ser and the deployer makes sure that these are already loaded? 

Thanks
Anita
--- David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:

> 
> On Apr 17, 2006, at 6:45 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> 
> > David,
> >     Thanks! How is j2ee-system configuration started now?
> 
> j2ee-system is the "root" configuration of the main geronimo server, 
> 
> and the config.ser file is actually in server.jar.  The Daemon  
> locates it in the classpath and starts it, see line 251.

     The naming is slightly confusing. The server.jar contains
j2ee-system configuraion and not j2ee-server. 

> 
> thanks
> david jencks
> 
> >
> > Thanks
> > Anita
> >
> > --- David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:20 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> >>
> >>>    The j2ee-security configuration imports only rmi-naming
> >>> configuration. What about j2ee-server configuration?
> >>
> >> I think calling the server side security config j2ee-security
> might
> >> be misleading;  perhaps we should call it server-security.  In any
> >> case, it doesn't need anything from j2ee-server, so it doesn't
> import
> >>
> >> it.
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> david jencks
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Anita
> >>>
> >>> --- Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
> >>>>>> SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Dain,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with
> >> trunk,
> >>>>> should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at
> >>>> j2ee-corba
> >>>>> plan and commit these changes to trunk?
> >>>>
> >>>> sure
> >>>>
> >>>> -dain
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com