Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81851 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2006 08:47:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Apr 2006 08:47:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 47420 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2006 08:46:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 47362 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2006 08:46:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 47351 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2006 08:46:57 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 01:46:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of eljotpl@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.205 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.205] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.82.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 01:46:56 -0700 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so486093wxc for ; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 01:46:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FvWsXFBbFp7biG2agCW5QalBYoaFRMTwwsv/pLydcS9A3UO75QakGloBvvpqCvafsgg5K6bCpMuY+aC+JVLrmyz5hc0AS8+E3/7CBOET84GbvOaCTugx0fqGrDUuNSNMTlgnB5pXnen7u0RncQh2KcWJm5Od/7pno196Z9I9k8k= Received: by 10.70.109.8 with SMTP id h8mr1765743wxc; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 01:46:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.90.20 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 01:46:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b5bfeb50604090146u42f3b180hea7e615a11851e34@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 10:46:36 +0200 From: "Jacek Laskowski" Reply-To: jacek@laskowski.net.pl Sender: eljotpl@gmail.com To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Merging from 1.1 to HEAD In-Reply-To: <74e15baa0604081706y1e199bf5g8e328310ea1f4d15@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <74e15baa0604081706y1e199bf5g8e328310ea1f4d15@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 4/9/06, Aaron Mulder wrote: > So I'm putting some stuff into 1.1, some of which is related to config > IDs and some of which is not. > > My question is, for the stuff unrelated to config IDs, should I be > merging to HEAD right away? Or is it going to be easier if I don't > and we merge "everything" at once later? Hi Aaron, I'd say do what's better for you atm. I guess it's not going to be an easy task to merge them so the more we've got sooner the better the merging will be. Btw, how do you do it? What's the command to merge the branch? Can you filter out some changes? How? > I have also previously put some things into HEAD which I would like to > get into 1.1. I assume I should merge those to 1.1 soon, because I > expect we will prepare the 1.1 release before attempting to fully > merge 1.1 into HEAD. Is that right? Matt will surely know the answer, so I leave it to him ;) > Aaron Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.laskowski.org.pl