Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3)
In-Reply-To: <74e15baa0604211637r5c14e593ue6c8a488d3d3a958@mail.gmail.com>
References: <A14221D6-90F6-40BD-AB8D-FC145AE4D631@iq80.com>
 <74e15baa0604211637r5c14e593ue6c8a488d3d3a958@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <1AA8C4C2-D2D4-4EAC-B2B1-385F7AAC2C32@iq80.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com>
Subject: Re: Remove jmx-debug application
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:45:54 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

jconsole service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/JMXConnector

username: system
password: manager

Click on the tree to see mbeans... edit them on the right

-dain

On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:

> Works for me.  Could someone put together a detailed howto on hooking
> JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there?
>
> Thanks,
>     Aaron
>
> On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
>> I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application.  The
>> application is very ugly and hard to us.  Also doesn't allow you to
>> execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is
>> really only useful for display purposes.  Instead a user can connect
>> to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX
>> consoles out there.
>>
>> For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx
>> console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the
>> console as a portlet.
>>
>> This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated
>> ObjectName methods on the kernel.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> -dain
>>