Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31093 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2006 18:39:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2006 18:39:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 29480 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2006 18:39:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 29181 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2006 18:39:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 29170 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2006 18:39:14 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:39:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [206.190.53.31] (HELO smtp106.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com) (206.190.53.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:39:13 -0700 Received: (qmail 97343 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2006 18:38:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?9.37.214.127?) (spalias78@129.33.49.251 with plain) by smtp106.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Apr 2006 18:38:52 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) In-Reply-To: <74e15baa0604281051n57d8b3ddj3288d1ead8496c21@mail.gmail.com> References: <74e15baa0604281051n57d8b3ddj3288d1ead8496c21@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <04977A2C-73E4-41FE-9E74-E68B37E8EE6E@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sachin Patel Subject: Re: will multiple targets conflict? Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:39:52 -0400 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N The eclipse-aware config store is a subclass of the repository config- store, so yes, there would be more then one. (Currently due to it being a subclass the metadata would be written to the instance repo, but I'm thinking about moving this internally to generate inside the eclipse workspace metadata. So either way if the CLI deployed to both writeable config stores, I'm thinking there would be issues with that, so "no" to the second question. - sachin On Apr 28, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: > Is there going to be more than one writeable config store per > server? Can the default be to deploy to all writeable config stores? > > Aaron > > On 4/28/06, Dain Sundstrom wrote: >> On Apr 28, 2006, at 9:48 AM, Sachin Patel wrote: >> >> > Aaron, >> > >> > If no targets are specified by default the current help specifies >> > that the the configuration will be deployed to all targets. Will >> > this cause conflicts? i.e config store A may not be able to >> > correctly resolve a configuration that can only be understood by >> > config store B, as will be the case with the eclipse scenario. In >> > the case that the app can be successfully deployed to both, how >> > does this impact the application at runtime? If I hit an app in the >> > browser which config store is it running off off? >> > >> > Does there need to be a notion of a default config store and if no >> > targets are specified the default is used? I'm concerned with the >> > eclipse-aware configuration store causing issues with a given >> > server instance being used for "normal" deployment. >> >> +1 >> >> -dain >> >>