geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject Re: Implementing Global JNDI
Date Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:58:34 GMT
Its been noted that we need a R/W JNDI Impl.  I believe its on the roadmap.

Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> When a JNDI context is created for a given configuration, the interface 
> name is used to determine the name of the gbean that will be mapped to 
> this JNDI reference (and to create a proxy ?).
> Take a look at o.a.g.naming.ENCConfigBuilder#addResourceRefs.
> But I guess this is irrelevant if the objects are bound when they are 
> created.
> 
> Btw, should the global JNDI tree be read-only, or read-write ? IMHO, a 
> read-write global JNDI tree would be very usefull.
> 
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> 
> 
> Manu George wrote:
> 
>> Thanks David.
>>
>> Guillaume , Which proxy in the JNDI Tree are you referring where 
>> geronimo requires the main interface name?  Are you speaking of 
>> UserTransaction etc? I thought those were standard names that we can 
>> use to access them and will not be provided in DD? Please clarify and 
>> correct me if I am wrong.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Manu
>>
>> On 4/25/06, *David Jencks* <david_jencks@yahoo.com 
>> <mailto:david_jencks@yahoo.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     It's required for corba ejb references.
>>
>>     david jencks
>>
>>     On Apr 25, 2006, at 7:34 AM, Manu George wrote:
>>
>>     > Hi,
>>     >         I have a question regarding one of the objects present in
>>     > the current application local JNDI Context. What is the
>>     > HandleDelegate entry for?
>>     >
>>     > Thanks
>>     > Manu
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message