geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject Re: Merging from 1.1 to HEAD
Date Tue, 11 Apr 2006 06:05:54 GMT
I'll defer my movement of the cram the defects in by Friday until we see how bad CTS is.  Kevan

thinks he might have some initial thoughts on where we stand this week.

Yes, I know the results are secret, that we run them is not :-P

Matt

Aaron Mulder wrote:
> I vote we plan to freeze on a Monday rather than a Friday, so we get
> the weekend to cram in the last bits.  :)  I know there are a still
> ton of JIRAs with my name on them for 1.1.
> 
> I'm a little worried that there have been some showstopper bugs in 1.1
> that were only found and addressed in the last few days, but I guess
> we have some time after the freeze to stabilize and we'll see what the
> TCK reports as far as the main J2EE features go.
> 
> As far as what I want to merge in from HEAD, the new keystore portlet
> and the configuration import/export features -- it's all in that one
> JIRA of "stuff to merge from HEAD to 1.1".
> 
> Thanks,
>     Aaron
> 
> On 4/10/06, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> 
>>I was travelling yesterday so apologies for the late reply.
>>
>>
>>
>>Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>
>>>So I'm putting some stuff into 1.1, some of which is related to config
>>>IDs and some of which is not.
>>>
>>>My question is, for the stuff unrelated to config IDs, should I be
>>>merging to HEAD right away?  Or is it going to be easier if I don't
>>>and we merge "everything" at once later?
>>>
>>>I have also previously put some things into HEAD which I would like to
>>>get into 1.1.  I assume I should merge those to 1.1 soon, because I
>>>expect we will prepare the 1.1 release before attempting to fully
>>>merge 1.1 into HEAD.  Is that right?
>>
>>Move them sooner than later.  The original plan was to freeze code on Friday.  We
would then work
>>the stable branch to CTS compliance and if there was time left layer in other stuff.
 I really,
>>really want to get this out by April 28th so that when Java One rolls around we aren't
locked up in
>>a hotel room trying to get a release done.  If it is risky please defer it.
>>
>>What were the specific features you were looking at ?
>>
>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>    Aaron
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message