geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Shared Libs
Date Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:45:14 GMT
One new feature I'm working on for 1.1 is support for tomcat style  
shared libs.  This creates a shared class loader visible to all j2ee  
applications which contains shared/lib/*.jar and shared/classes/ to  
the class loader.

Will this address your issues?

-dain

On Apr 4, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:

>
> I have a situation where I need to make several web modules  
> dependent upon a large number of jars.  I'd like to add the jars to  
> the Geronimo repo and add the dependencies into the plans for the  
> web modules. However, most of the jars don't follow the maven  
> naming convention because the names don't include a version (and  
> I'd rather not rename all the jars).
>
> I know that there are changes being included in 1.1 to make the  
> version in a reference optional.  However, I doubt that it is  
> possible to reference a jar in the repo that doesn't contain any  
> version.  Just thought I should ask in case it really is possible.   
> I could see where this might be something users would like when  
> they have picked up jars from various places which may or may not  
> contain a version in the jar name.
>
> If it *is* possible to have a non-versioned jar in the repo ... how  
> do we differentiate in geronimo 1.1 between a dependency on a non- 
> versioned jar versus a dependency on the latest version of a jar  
> (in case both are present).
>
> Thanks for the help,
> Joe
>
> -- 
> Joe Bohn
> joe.bohn at earthlink.net
>
> "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he  
> cannot lose."   -- Jim Elliot


Mime
View raw message