Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11588 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2006 16:16:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2006 16:16:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 11776 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2006 16:16:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 11729 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2006 16:16:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 11717 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2006 16:16:13 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:16:13 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.180] (HELO pproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.166.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:16:11 -0800 Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n25so964419pyg for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:15:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GG2KUoAZaXXMUnRTCzjNpmnTJ9ieBctcG++4KBp/rAn1tHSL/D9KFTpeltq9cSzoGHxwd0ENKQ6utfsE0MIeIR0WRksPF1zMXjkC1LSkDCAAFNsuEA9xztaa4ndFpPpUu0q2f3kxH8khQldO1+R/3kJzKtWTNHG/yC8u3XC2iGg= Received: by 10.35.36.13 with SMTP id o13mr1010770pyj; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:15:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.34.5 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:15:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:15:50 -0500 From: "Prasad Kashyap" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: M2 migration status In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060317154117.26726.qmail@web31704.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060317155945.84601.qmail@web31711.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Anita, You can do away with this line that you have in your tomcat's pom ${user.home}/.m2/repository You can get it by using ${settings.localRepository}. You don't need to have a settings.xml file. Cheers Prasad On 3/17/06, Prasad Kashyap wrote: > Jetty has the same issue. Tests run successfuly from inside the > module. Fail from the top level dir. > > On 3/17/06, Prasad Kashyap wrote: > > Working on it ! > > > > Cheers > > Prasad > > > > On 3/17/06, anita kulshreshtha wrote: > > > I just built tomcat-builder and security from the > > > top level!! All with surefire 2.1.3-SNAPSHOT! I think > > > now we can call everything except jetty migrated. Any > > > takers for jetty ? > > > > > > Thnaks > > > Anita > > > > > > --- anita kulshreshtha wrote: > > > > > > > Good news...... I just added a line > > > > ${basedir} > > > > to surefire configuraiton for tomcat and built it > > > > with > > > > mvn -o -Dmodule=3Dtomcat clean test !!!! > > > > I think we can use this temporarily, until maven > > > > guys decide to fix it. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Anita > > > > --- anita kulshreshtha wrote: > > > > > > > > > Few more things.... > > > > > 1. Need to remove > > > > > true > > > > > in all *-builders. > > > > > 2. All paths in java.io are resolved to user.dir > > > > > which > > > > > is the dir in which the jvm was invoked. M2 is not > > > > > invoking the jvm in the correct directory. It > > > > causes > > > > > all the paths to be resolved incorrectly. All the > > > > > log > > > > > files axis.log, login-audit.log, network.log are > > > > > not > > > > > created properly. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Anita > > > > > > > > > > --- Prasad Kashyap > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > All but just the following 4 modules to be > > > > > migrated. > > > > > > > > > > > > interop > > > > > > jetty > > > > > > jetty-builder > > > > > > axis-builder. > > > > > > > > > > > > Then there are the "almost-there" modules. These > > > > > > modules have pending > > > > > > work like one of the following - > > > > > > 1. tests don't work due to surefire plugin's > > > > bugs > > > > > > 2. properties/other resources are not procesed. > > > > > > 3. properties/resources are not in the m2 dir > > > > > > structure. > > > > > > > > > > > > Patches ready : > > > > > > j2ee-builder : > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1713 > > > > > > axis-builder : > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1723 > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Prasad > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/13/06, Prasad Kashyap > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > j2ee-builder done. I have also pruned the > > > > > > dependency lists for > > > > > > > j2ee-builder and j2ee. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will update the patch now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > Prasad > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/13/06, Henri Yandell > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 3/10/06, Jacek Laskowski > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > 2006/3/9, Henri Yandell > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The geronimo-spec-j2ee-deployment module > > > > > was > > > > > > giving errors; but I > > > > > > > > > > realised I was building under JDK 1.5. > > > > It > > > > > > works fine under 1.4; so > > > > > > > > > > something for the future there perhaps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I've seen a way to make sure that > > > > M2 > > > > > > is used on Java 1.4. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, there might be a way to leverage it > > > > and > > > > > > ensure Java 1.4 runtime. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next I get errors from the Geronimo :: > > > > > > Directory module; this is > > > > > > > > > > because I'm being a aggressive and > > > > turning > > > > > > off the snapshot > > > > > > > > > > repositories in the top pom. > > > > > directory-asn1 > > > > > > depends on commons-test, > > > > > > > > > > which is unreleased. In this case the > > > > > ideal > > > > > > solution is to set > > > > > > > > > > commons-test to test scope so it doesn't > > > > > end > > > > > > up in the build - I'll > > > > > > > > > > work on getting that changed - or just > > > > > > having them not depend on > > > > > > > > > > commons-test :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Great. I'm looking forward to committing > > > > > your > > > > > > patch ;) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixed it at the other end. The commons-test > > > > > > dependency no longer gets > > > > > > > > passed along transitively. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now I find that everything builds from the > > > > top > > > > > > down - except for the 2 > > > > > > > > Tomcat tests that already appear to be being > > > > > > looked into. This is with > > > > > > > > the snapshot repositories commented out - > > > > they > > > > > > slow things down and > > > > > > > > seem to lead to errors that mean I have to > > > > > keep > > > > > > repeating the build > > > > > > > > until they've finally downloaded things. > > > > > There's > > > > > > some way to change > > > > > > > > their strategy I think - must look into > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Slowly moving axis-builder along. Looks like > > > > > the > > > > > > Maven xmlbeans plugin > > > > > > > > depends on a snapshot version of xmlbeans, > > > > so > > > > > > that's irritating :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > > > > protection around > > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > > > protection around > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > >