Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65628 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2006 20:02:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2006 20:02:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 86956 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2006 20:02:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 86871 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2006 20:02:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 86846 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2006 20:02:14 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:02:13 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.183 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.183] (HELO pproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.166.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:02:13 -0800 Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n25so1049377pyg for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:01:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=lSia9d+FoxkVaoeEZ6k0HMWHhzv+dpiVaL8ypMCcBWpiq+/aLopZvUeHfGv53+b7xlAZrefKLy3q/yByFkxd/IMc/mW9VyYq0ZPdjSOo/DvruEOVqskODzlmKrih6Y8k0kMF+3YU+xNoKVwi2LBsn68/J2F8RRYI5NMS+GHoyBw= Received: by 10.35.70.17 with SMTP id x17mr1139122pyk; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:01:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.1.2? ( [67.180.143.96]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id w66sm292074pyw.2006.03.17.12.01.51; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:01:52 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.3) In-Reply-To: <2945C3B1-5874-4524-AC6F-2C12F0186E45@visi.com> References: <2945C3B1-5874-4524-AC6F-2C12F0186E45@visi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jason Dillon Subject: Re: Incubations Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:01:49 -0800 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.3) Sender: Jason Dillon X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I agree. While opinions are valuable, when they are collected in emails like this they become dangerous and harmful. --jason On Mar 17, 2006, at 10:32 AM, David Blevins wrote: > Seriously, people. Let's refrain from sensational emails whose > only point is to make things worse. > > We are all here cause we want to work together and make great > communities, software and a better ASF. > > -David > > On Mar 17, 2006, at 10:23 AM, lichtner wrote: > >> >> I wanted to see what this incubation problem is all about, so I >> took a >> look at the web site http://incubator.apache.org/resolution.html . >> >> It says that the B.o.D. has determined that it's in "the best >> interests of >> the Foundation" to create this incubator PMC charged with "providing >> guidance", to help products engender "their own collaborative >> community", >> and "educating" new developers. >> >> So you do not want to get incubated by Apache unless: >> >> - You care deeply about the Apache Foundation. >> - You project needs "guidance." >> - You need your project to have a "community." >> >> Philosophy eventually rises up to the surface. This resolution may >> explain >> why we are seeing so many emails about ActiveMQ graduating etc. >> >> The Apache Foundation is generous to provide resources to open-source >> projects, but this is not an entirely selfless act. If your project >> consists of one person, it does not qualify as a good ASF project >> because >> it doesn't have a "community", for example. If your project doesn't >> believe in democracy then it's not a good ASF project. >> >> Personally, I would not get a project incubated to help ASF be all >> it can >> be. I don't necessarily care about ASF, I do care about the Apache >> httpd >> and the other projects which are hosted by ASF but which might as >> well be >> hosted somewhere else. >> >> I think that if Geronimo is at odds with ASF's idealistic, abstract >> motivations it should pack up its code and move somewhere else >> where it >> can focus on coding. If they are only staying for the free >> services then >> perhaps IBM can donate those. >> >> Not to mention that the project is so big it could have its own >> foundation ... >> >