Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2)
In-Reply-To: <4406A4FA.4050605@mortbay.com>
References: <4406A4FA.4050605@mortbay.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <981CC694-BB3C-4F99-BADF-7DF46BC607A2@hiramchirino.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
Subject: Re: heads-up: Servlet-2.5 & jetty 6 branch?
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 12:51:39 -0500
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

+1

On Mar 2, 2006, at 2:55 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote:

>
> All,
>
> I'm tuning back into G after zoning out for a while....
> I'd like to started work on the jetty6 integration to
> provide servlet 2.5
>
> The goals of the jetty 6 integration will be:
>  + 2.5 servlet API.
>  + annotation support
>  + Simplify integration using Jetty 6 interceptor friendly  
> architecture.
>  + Use geronimo threadpool
>  + Use Session API ( or iteration of that (see comments posted  
> earlier)) as
>    basis of session manager
>  + Experiment with WADI and clustering integration
>  + Better JACC specific security handler (perhaps to be back ported  
> to Jetty)
>  + Potentially use common server socket factories and eventually  
> SSL Engine
>    factories
>
> For this I'm going to created a branch geronimo/sandbox/servlet-2.5
> and add geronimo-spec-servlet to geronimo/spec/branches/JEE5
>
> I'm going for a full branch:
>
>  + because I actually want to see how hard it will be to use
>    svn to maintain a parallel dev branch.
>  + I want some stability
>  + I think there will be some moderately global changes that
>    may affect multiple modules.
>  + The branch will be a good place for a 2.5 tomcat module
>    to be developed at the same time.
>
> everybody OK with this?
> I'd like to start this soonish, although I'm tempted to wait
> for maven2 to be working.
>
> cheers
>
>
>