Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
In-Reply-To: <442469A1.4010202@coderesearch.com>
References: <4424668B.8070104@gmail.com> <442469A1.4010202@coderesearch.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <0098EF44-7E5E-4F49-8995-C702238E96D2@iq80.com>
Cc: dev <dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com>
Subject: Re: Geronimo documentation update
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 11:36:19 -0800
To: user@geronimo.apache.org

The objectweb wrapper is LGPL licensed where as the Java Service =20
Wrapper uses the MIT license which is compatible with the ASL.  Also, =20=

I had never heard of the objectweb project until you pointed it out =20
where as virtually every major site I go to uses Java Service Wrapper =20=

to manage their application servers.  As for technology, I've =20
personally never used either.

-dain

On Mar 24, 2006, at 1:50 PM, Mario R=FCbsam wrote:

> Hi,
>
> can anybody tell me the difference/advantage between the documented =20=

> wrapper
> and JavaService from http://javaservice.objectweb.org (the wrapper =20
> I currently use in production)?
>
> Thanks,
> Mario
>
>
>
> Hernan Cunico wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I found the thread on Java Service Wrapper very cool. I gathered =20
>> the info from the thread and put it together in an article with =20
>> the steps for configuring Geronimo to run as a Windows service. =20
>> Here is the link,
>> http://opensource2.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/=20
>> Configuring+Geronimo+as+a+Windows+Service Cheers!
>> Hernan