geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Dudney <bdud...@apache.org>
Subject Re: specs and javadoc question
Date Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:41:55 GMT
Hi Geir,

They are part of the schema in the spec pdf, no claimed copyright in  
the schema definition.

TTFN,

Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org



On Mar 8, 2006, at 4:48 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:

> if the comments are part of someone else's copyrighted material,  
> and it's not under a permissive open source license, please don't  
> copy them.
>
> geir
>
>
> Bill Dudney wrote:
>> So I will go ahead and type the comments (I'm more than half way  
>> through it anyway) and then we can delete them if we need to.
>> OK?
>> Jeff or anyone else, who should I go to for official statement?  
>> legal@?
>> TTFN,
>> Bill Dudney
>> MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
>> Wadi - incubator.apache.org/wadi
>> On Mar 7, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> John Sisson wrote:
>>>> We shouldn't retype the comments in the XSD just like the  
>>>> javadoc in the
>>>> spec.  You are welcome to type your own original comments.
>>>
>>> This is debatable for XSDs.  We currently seem to be using a lot  
>>> of XSDs
>>> verbatim for the SPECs, so we need an official statement on this.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>> Bill Dudney wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this must have gotten lost in the traffic over the  
>>>>> weekend.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone know if I should/have to retype all the documentation  
>>>>> comments
>>>>> in the XSD?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill Dudney
>>>>> MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 5, 2006, at 6:50 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> One other question - the documentation comments in the XML  
>>>>>> schema for
>>>>>> the spec? Should I type in these comments or leave them out?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -bd-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 3, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW add a jira for this, so everyone knows you are working on
 
>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -dain
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:02 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the comments.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dain: Yeah its not copying out of the pdf but simply typing,
 
>>>>>>>> hardly
>>>>>>>> feels like original work though so even though I'm not  
>>>>>>>> copying, it
>>>>>>>> sure feels like it. :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll leave the comments out and post a patch after I get
one  
>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>> pass over it (~early next week).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TTFN,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bill Dudney
>>>>>>>> MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:37 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've started getting ready for JSF 1.2 and figured
that a  
>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>> place for the api jar to land is the uber spec
project @  
>>>>>>>>>>> G for
>>>>>>>>>>> JavaEE 5.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm most of the way there for Servlet 2.5 and
JSP 2.1 but  
>>>>>>>>>>> I was
>>>>>>>>>>> wondering about javadoc. Does anyone know what
the rules are
>>>>>>>>>>> regarding javadoc in the spec code? I've just
been doing a
>>>>>>>>>>> straight copy/typing of the api and leaving out
the  
>>>>>>>>>>> javadoc. But
>>>>>>>>>>> looking back at the Servlet 2.4 and JSP 2.0 spec
modules  
>>>>>>>>>>> all the
>>>>>>>>>>> javadoc is there.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No "copying" only "typing" is allowed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to submit the patch for Servlet 2.5
and JSP 2.1  
>>>>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>>>> next week or so. If anyone knows the definitive
answer  
>>>>>>>>>>> (or since
>>>>>>>>>>> we are not lawyers as close to definitive as
possible:)  
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd love
>>>>>>>>>>> to hear it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have not been copying the javadocs into the specs
I have  
>>>>>>>>>> worked
>>>>>>>>>> on.  I think that our servlet 2.4 and jsp 2.0 specs
are  
>>>>>>>>>> copied
>>>>>>>>>> from tomcat where they were IIUC donated complete
with  
>>>>>>>>>> javadocs
>>>>>>>>>> by sun.  I think leaving out the javadoc is the wisest
 
>>>>>>>>>> course.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, the javadoc comments are owned by Sun.  If you would
 
>>>>>>>>> like to
>>>>>>>>> write your own *original* javadoc comments, that would
be  
>>>>>>>>> cool,
>>>>>>>>> but not necessary.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -dain
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>


Mime
View raw message