geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: A couple of javamail questions
Date Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:13:01 GMT
On Mar 7, 2006, at 9:44 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:

> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>> On Mar 7, 2006, at 6:47 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>> I'm currently working on adding NNTP Store support to the  
>>> Geronimo javamail code, which is built on top of the code that  
>>> was integrated last week that added NNTP Transport support.  I've  
>>> ran into a little gotcha on this.  The Store and Transport  
>>> providers are defined in the javamail.default.providers file, and  
>>> all providers must be unique (e.g., smtp, pop3, etc.).  For NNTP,  
>>> we're going to have both a Store and a Transport, and only one  
>>> can have the nntp name.  The Sun impl doesn't have nntp, so  
>>> there's no guidance from that corner.
>>>
>>> GNU classpath has an NNTP implementation, and that version uses  
>>> "nntp" for the Store, and "nntp-post" for the Transport.  The  
>>> Geronimo code is currently using "nntp" for the Transport, but  
>>> it's easy enough to change that as I doubt this code is widely  
>>> used after less than one week.  Should we copy what GNU did or  
>>> use something else (perhaps "nntp" and "news")?
>>
>> I think we should follow the convention of GNU classpath
>>
>>> Also, the vendor information in the javamaildefault.providers  
>>> file includes version numbers.  Should we be incrementing at  
>>> least the smtp version number since this has changed considerably  
>>> since the last Geronimo release, or should we change these to  
>>> line up with Geronimo release versions.  Thus new providers would  
>>> not be 1.0 even though they are new in this release.
>>
>> Can we make the vendor version number match the module version  
>> number in Maven?
> Fairly easily done, but it is a manual process at the moment.

Nothing a little velocity can't fix :)

> I just wasn't certain we wanted to increment all of the version  
> numbers for the providers even if nothing changed in the code.

I definitely think the numbers should match.  If we want this module  
to move at a different rate and pace then the main server, we move  
the code to be next to the geronimo tree (a.k.a. a sub project).

-dain


Mime
View raw message