geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <>
Subject Re: Restructuring top level pom.xml
Date Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:16:29 GMT

On Mar 17, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:

> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>> 2006/3/17, Prasad Kashyap <>:
>>> This will make our top level pom.xml a huge big list. Are we sure  
>>> we want to keep it structured this way ?
>> Hi Prasad, It looks that we're quickly approaching Dave's idea  
>> when he had envisioned the modules listed in one place would  
>> require a lot of effort to maintain. I personally don't think we  
>> have since lost the time as I couldn't see it the first time while  
>> having read Dave's email. Now, we're finally more experienced to  
>> get the gist of what he was saying ;) I'm for changing the parent  
>> pom to include only a few modules with a few more submodules  
>> rather than keeping them all in it. If it doesn't work we can  
>> always restructure it again ;) Any comments before the change  
>> appears?
> Maybe the members of the children POMs' group ids could be named:
> org.apache.geronimo.applications
> org.apache.geronimo.modules
> Etc.

Would you then move all the code inside to the same package, as in  
org.apache.geronimo.modules.kernel or  


View raw message