BTW add a jira for this, so everyone knows you are working on it.
-dain
On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:02 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> Dain: Yeah its not copying out of the pdf but simply typing, hardly
> feels like original work though so even though I'm not copying, it
> sure feels like it. :-)
>
> I'll leave the comments out and post a patch after I get one more
> pass over it (~early next week).
>
> TTFN,
>
>
> Bill Dudney
> MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
>
> On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>> On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:37 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I've started getting ready for JSF 1.2 and figured that a good
>>>> place for the api jar to land is the uber spec project @ G for
>>>> JavaEE 5.
>>>>
>>>> I'm most of the way there for Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 but I was
>>>> wondering about javadoc. Does anyone know what the rules are
>>>> regarding javadoc in the spec code? I've just been doing a
>>>> straight copy/typing of the api and leaving out the javadoc. But
>>>> looking back at the Servlet 2.4 and JSP 2.0 spec modules all the
>>>> javadoc is there.
>>
>> No "copying" only "typing" is allowed.
>>
>>>> I'd like to submit the patch for Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 in the
>>>> next week or so. If anyone knows the definitive answer (or since
>>>> we are not lawyers as close to definitive as possible:) I'd love
>>>> to hear it.
>>>
>>> I have not been copying the javadocs into the specs I have worked
>>> on. I think that our servlet 2.4 and jsp 2.0 specs are copied
>>> from tomcat where they were IIUC donated complete with javadocs
>>> by sun. I think leaving out the javadoc is the wisest course.
>>
>> Yes, the javadoc comments are owned by Sun. If you would like to
>> write your own *original* javadoc comments, that would be cool,
>> but not necessary.
>>
>> -dain
|