geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <>
Subject Re: 1.1 Release is gearing up...let's start stting the release goals
Date Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:59:40 GMT
There are a few chunks of code in trunk that probably need to be moved
over, like the local configuration's (config.xml) ability to remove
attributes/empty values, etc.


Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> All,
> Dain and David have mostly completed their work in branches/1.1.  Given
> that the easy part of the change has been done its time to start
> thinking about getting 1.1 out the door.
> The theme for 1.1 I think is appropriate is bug fixes, performance
> improvements and new features.
> Here is the order I'd like to proceed with to get 1.1 released:
> 1. Get the 1.1 release stabilized and freeze changes temporarily.
> 2. Run the TCK and confirm that what we have passes CTS.
> 3. Upgrade a limited set of function into 1.1 that is fiarly atomic.
> 4. Complete a final CTS run and then release 1.1 to the world.
> As far as the upgrades I expect that there is a lot of function people
> would like to drop in.  Based on what I've seen on the list in terms of
> discussion here is my initial list.  I think a 1.1 release with just the
> configId changes isn't really that dramatic from a user perspective so I
> think we need to add some additional content.
> * Upgrade TranQL and TranQL Connector to 1.3 and 1.2 respectively.  I've
> added a statement cache that gives about a 30% performance boost on JDBC
> primitives in DayTrader.  I think this is a significant improvement over
> 1.0 and is fairly limited in its scope.
> * Upgrade ActiveMQ to Version 4.  I don't know all the changes so we
> need Hiram's input here but I think some of the improvements included
> improved configurability.
> * Upgrade the Jetty Version to address the security problem we noted in
> 1.0.
> * I'll compile a list of outstanding JIRA's for 1.0 and give a first
> triage on them today.
> * Tech preview of the installer.  Erik, I think that it is ready to go,
> is this correct?
> Please respond with your input in terms of what should be included. 
> Please consider that we have only a week or so to get them incorporated
> before we start the final TCK run.
> Personally I'd like to shoot for a 1.2 by JavaOne (or at least June if
> we can't make JavaOne) with some improvements targetted at the
> schizophrenic server :), ahem, flexible server.)  It would be nice to
> have something to showcase at ApacheCon in June as well as the TSS Europe.
> Let the creative juices flow.
> Matt

View raw message