geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <>
Subject Re: Restructuring top level pom.xml
Date Sat, 18 Mar 2006 16:37:44 GMT
David Blevins wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>> 2006/3/17, Prasad Kashyap <>:
>>>> This will make our top level pom.xml a huge big list. Are we sure 
>>>> we want to keep it structured this way ?
>>> Hi Prasad, It looks that we're quickly approaching Dave's idea when 
>>> he had envisioned the modules listed in one place would require a 
>>> lot of effort to maintain. I personally don't think we have since 
>>> lost the time as I couldn't see it the first time while having read 
>>> Dave's email. Now, we're finally more experienced to get the gist of 
>>> what he was saying ;) I'm for changing the parent pom to include 
>>> only a few modules with a few more submodules rather than keeping 
>>> them all in it. If it doesn't work we can always restructure it 
>>> again ;) Any comments before the change appears?
>> Maybe the members of the children POMs' group ids could be named:
>> org.apache.geronimo.applications
>> org.apache.geronimo.modules
>> Etc.
> Would you then move all the code inside to the same package, as in 
> org.apache.geronimo.modules.kernel or 
> org.apache.geronimo.applications.daytrader?
> -David
I don't think that this is necessary but, it could be handy. 


View raw message