geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bohn <joe.b...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: M2 migration status
Date Thu, 09 Mar 2006 16:22:59 GMT

Prasad Kashyap wrote:

> Here's my next concern. For these modules that have migrated to m2, we
> should include them in the daily G builds as soon as possible. If we
> don't pull out the m1 build artifacts, project.xml and maven.xml from
> the migrated modules, then there's a chance that those may get changed
> behind our backs while we go forward converting more. There might be a
> regression of issues.

I have the same concern and voiced it (from the other direction) in my 
post on little-G.

We also need to ensure that when we clearly communicate what version(s) 
of maven are required to build Geronimo, the updated build process, and 
be aware of the waiting changes that may be impacted before we actually 
start yanking things.

To accomplish that last goal we need some way to communicate changes 
that are waiting or in-progress which may affect or be affected by the 
M2 conversion.  Then we can work together more closely to ensure that 
nothing is lost during the conversion.  I will add comments to the M2 
migration status list with a reference to the little-G JIRA for items 
where I am aware of overlap.  Can others please do the same for items 
they are involved in?

Thanks,
Joe

-- 
Joe Bohn
joe.bohn at earthlink.net

"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot 
lose."   -- Jim Elliot

Mime
View raw message