Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73877 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2006 01:26:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2006 01:26:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 72026 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2006 01:25:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 71973 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2006 01:25:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 71962 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2006 01:25:56 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:25:56 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ammulder@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.203 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.203] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.92.203) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:25:55 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j3so314494ugf for ; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:25:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QI6N0UWD3aXcpvl5jDmIW3pmtbyf4AZ+xTXOhuWbJThl2dJ825J43XScc0o5I8ds1iIN1WRiUEt3PVRlYrxt6Mi8znygp27mHMAMfkbjKzq3oKqSI0gIWhB/re9hkdED+HVs/xPCGUHfVLgWiJ64wOgf6lZIlLG8AIWTIYYoBaA= Received: by 10.67.31.9 with SMTP id i9mr1923086ugj; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:25:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.219.2 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:25:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <74e15baa0602051725y5ca815c7y403ef68fb9a9baa8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:25:34 -0500 From: Aaron Mulder Sender: ammulder@gmail.com To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: tranql needed for full build? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6FB8FE0D-6153-4912-81C5-D22373ABBB2C@planet57.com> <55A23254-B5AC-4D36-9B87-A7A78EA3EF6A@yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N We haven't considered TranQL source necessary for quite a while. The only source that should be regularly checked out is OpenEJB, and we're considering moving away even from that. Thanks, Aaron On 2/5/06, Jason Dillon wrote: > By "full build" I mean, the build that should just always work... > latest stable development... if we had to release it, the same build > that would be used for that. > > On a related note, why don't we use vendor branches for sources that > are external to our SVN, but are critical for the build? > > --jason > > > On Feb 5, 2006, at 5:01 PM, David Jencks wrote: > > > tranql and tranql-connector don't change all that often but if you > > have them checked out you can build them as part of the project. > > Similarly if you don't check out openejb you can use downloaded > > jars. Anytime you do this your risk of mismatched jars increases. > > > > So, it depends what you mean by "full build" > > > > thanks > > david jencks > > > > On Feb 5, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: > > > >> Are the tranql sources needed for a full build? > >> > >> I noticed that new0 and new00 are both for tranql/* but m:checkout > >> has the tranql co commented out. > >> > >> --jason > > > >