Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4401756D.4080304@hogstrom.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:31:25 +0100
From: Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Changing Trunk to 1.2 in anticipation of 1.0.1 becoming 1.1
References: <43FA95C3.4010306@hogstrom.org> <43FAA09A.1020508@toolazydogs.com>
 <43FAAB3D.7070902@gmail.com> <43FE5793.7080009@hogstrom.org>
 <3F252A78-DEB9-4124-AD92-029B0F366B46@iq80.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F252A78-DEB9-4124-AD92-029B0F366B46@iq80.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dain,

Which part are you taking a crack at?   I've done some of the HEAD work.  Should 
I abandon that ?

Matt

Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Matt is traveling again, so I'm going to take a crack at this.
> 
> -dain
> 
> On Feb 23, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> 
>> John,
>>
>> Life has been a travelling adventure lately so apologies for my  tardy 
>> response.
>>
>> My thinking is as follows in order of steps:
>>
>> 1. Convert HEAD to 1.2 SNAPSHOT.  This will be good as we need to  get 
>> this story down to simply changing etc/project.properties or at  least 
>> as close as possible.
>>
>> 2. Once HEAD is changed and building correctly hopefully Dain and  
>> David will have something to show.  I know they've been bustin  their 
>> chops working on this.       We rename their branches/ configid to 
>> branches/1.1.  We'd have to ensure that changes made to  1.0 since 
>> they started get moved into their branch and then we can  delete the 
>> 1.0 branch since we have the 1.0.0.0 tag.
>>
>> 3. Apply the outstanding JIRA's I had previously identified.  We  need 
>> to figure out which ones are still important.
>>
>> I'd like to get the release out by the end of March.
>>
>> Is this clearer?
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> John Sisson wrote:
>>
>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/20/2006 8:23 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I was thinking that in order to expedite getting 1.1 our the  door 
>>>>> that it would make sense to move trunk to 1.2.  Then we'll  have to 
>>>>> do the same in the 1.0 branch.  I'm going to start  working on that 
>>>>> this week.  Comments, suggestions, ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So what is in trunk now?  What is in branches/1_0 now?  Where is  
>>>> the work for 1_1 taking place?
>>>>
>>> Matt,
>>> Could you please confirm the following..
>>> AFAIK, work for the 1.1 release (that was previously going to be  
>>> called the 1.0.1 release) should be done in the 1.0 branch (until  we 
>>> branch for 1.1?).
>>> Matt is proposing to change the version numbers in files in  
>>> branches/1.0 to be 1.1.  I assume you plan on doing this before we  
>>> create the 1.1 branch?
>>> Once the configId changes are merged in to branches/1.0 and we are  
>>> ready for a release we would create branches/1.1 from the 1.0 branch.
>>> If we are creating a 1.1 branch then does that mean there would be  
>>> no further work happening in the 1.0 branch once the branch is made?
>>> Work for the 1.2 release should be done in trunk.  I think Matt is  
>>> proposing to change the version numbers in files in trunk to be 1.2.
>>> Are we releasing version 1.1 of all the specs for the 1.1 release?
>>> Thanks,
>>> John
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> 
> 
> 
>