Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: 64.74.244.71 is neither permitted nor
 denied by domain of geir@pobox.com)
Message-ID: <43F20483.1000901@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:25:39 -0500
From: Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com>
Reply-To: geir@pobox.com
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bill Flood <bill.f.flood@gmail.com>
CC: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ode Proposal
References: 
 <OFA2EB2C7B.61230B9C-ON85257115.0056B1EA-85257115.0056CA20@jpmchase.com>
	 <43F1FD47.9090005@pobox.com>
 <de9130c00602140810v446c4640g594a080d5b73256b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <de9130c00602140810v446c4640g594a080d5b73256b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

There is a chicken-egg problem here - I'm afraid that would make some 
people unable to look at it.

I can understand not wanting to go through the pain of changing 
namespace until needed, but can it be made available under the Apache 
License (or another open source license of your choosing) for evaluation 
purposes?

While you ponder that, can the evaluation license under which the 
software is currently being offered be placed somewhere so we at least 
know the terms before downloading?

geir

Bill Flood wrote:
> The source can be found here:  ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/
> 
> If the community goes forward with the project, in one form or another, we
> are prepared to immediately change the license to the Apache form and modify
> the package names spaces as appropriate.
> 
> thanks
> 
> 
> On 2/14/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Wasn't it offered already to ServiceMix?
>>
>> I mean, people already voted on accepting the code, so I assume it's
>> available somewhere...
>>
>> geir
>>
>>
>> ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
>>> Great!
>>>
>>> I'm assuming the source won't be available for review unless/until Ode
>> is
>>> accepted as an incubator poddling?
>>>
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> It's better to be hated for who you are
>>> than loved for who you are not
>>>
>>> Ian D. Stewart
>>> Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
>>> JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
>>> Phone: (614) 244-2564
>>> Pager: (888) 260-0078
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                       James Strachan
>>>                       <james.strachan@g        To:
>> dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>>                       mail.com>                cc:
>> general@incubator.apache.org, servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>>                                                Subject:  Re: Ode
>> Proposal
>>>                       02/14/2006 10:10
>>>                       AM
>>>                       Please respond to
>>>                       dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14 Feb 2006, at 15:03, ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
>>>> Allan,
>>>>
>>>> This proposal appears to be gear towards the web services/SOA
>>>> community.
>>>> Is support for orchestration of non-WS business processes
>>>> considered out of
>>>> scope for Ode?
>>> No - the code should be reusable for most orchestration needs; even
>>> in cases where there are no pointy brackets involved :).
>>>
>>> James
>>> -------
>>> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>