Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=3q1Y1oFamIiJYYY0GNVjB1a5OFEd1dJPTiSArMLgXaFYt7HLra3FAz1r0gDavM3N1nzWJ7oMx+c0hOB4/vnUgcbZiA9xgCLs8709pahekw/U+SVR25yF83Pu2o4aBp2Y/XhMF5GHDF8aF7G4YZwCo4SkLxvYnsTaC5qimAvro4w=
  ;
Message-ID: <20060227160729.70084.qmail@web31707.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:07:28 -0800 (PST)
From: anita kulshreshtha <a_kulshre@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: A general question?
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <1b5bfeb50602270710s1aaadff6n@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


Thanks
Anita

--- Jacek Laskowski <eljotpl@gmail.com> wrote:

> 2006/2/27, anita kulshreshtha <a_kulshre@yahoo.com>:
> > Hi,
> >     IIRC, contributors could resolve the issues
> but
> > not close the issue. Can an issue be considered
> > resolved without the submitted patch being
> committed?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Consider the following scenario: the submitted patch
> is incorrect, but
> appropriate fix was provided and committed. Would
> you mark the issue
> as closed and/or resolved?
    In this case the committer would mark the Jira
issue as resolved/invalid/fixed or whatever the case
may be. IIUC, you are saying that the contributors can
mark the issue as 'resolved' to indicate that the
issue has been resolved to their satisfaction and wait
for the committers to look at their patch.
> 
> > Anita
> 
> Jacek
> 
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.laskowski.org.pl
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com