geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geron...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Test strategy -- itests and default database
Date Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:39:08 GMT
Hi David,

No I didn't make a list of the ones that work and the ones that don't.
But now I will soon.

Cheers
Prasad

On 2/21/06, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
> > True. The itests setup (infrastructure) which was broken by the move
> > has been restored. Itests can now be   plugged in and run
> > successfully. While some of the old itests pass successfully, some of
> > them fail. The ones that fail are the ones that depended on the
> > default-datasource.
> >
> > Around last Thu, I learnt from Dain (on the IRC)  that he'd be
> > creating a new default datasource to get those tests to pass too. I
> > don't know what the ETA on that is.
> >
>
> Dain, is that something you'd get to in the next week (guessing not
> with the config changes)?
>
> Prasad, do you know which test suites pass and which fail?  If we
> could figure that out we could comment out the ones that fail and get
> the itests running as part of the build again.  They're commented out
> now cause they cause the build to fail, which is bad news as someone
> will just break the infrastructure again without knowing it.
> Especially with all the maven2 conversion stuff going on.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -David
>
> > On 2/21/06, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
> >> On Jan 29, 2006, at 6:12 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> >>> I would like to propose the following test strategy.
> >>>
> >>> 1. Fix existing openejb itests such that they can be reintegrated
> >>> back
> >>> into the builds.
> >>
> >> On Feb 9, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have completed items 1 and 3 of the test strategy outlined above.
> >>> With that we now have the geronimo-deployment-plugin in maven 2.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Doesn't seem like item 1 was ever really checked off the list.  I
> >> just noticed the itests are still broken because of the whole default
> >> database issue.
> >>
> >> Where did we leave off on how to get them running again?  I remember
> >> some chatter on whether or not there should be a default database,
> >> etc.  But I also remember some IRC talk about just adding a connector
> >> to the itests to make them run.
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message