geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] 1.0.1 Release and the configId issue
Date Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:19:27 GMT
> [X] +1 Document issue in release notes and defer fix to 1.1

This situation is very unfortunate, but I don't think fixing this can  
possible be justified in a 1.0.x point release due to the extensive  
modifications of basic geronimo plumbing necessary for a forward  
compatible solution, and I don't see anyone willing to work on it for  

david jencks

On Feb 1, 2006, at 9:48 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> There was some discussion on Irc earlier this week about the issue  
> related to plans having to be changed due to module versions  
> changing.  This is clearly going to be a significant issues for  
> customers as they will have to re-work all their plans on  
> incremental server changes.  Although these will most likely be  
> tolerated in the short-term this is a serious shortcoming in the  
> current design that needs to be addressed.
> During the discussion it was asserted tha given the magnitude of  
> the change to the format of the plans and changes to G it was not  
> appropriate for make this change in a maintenance release.  The  
> collective wisdom was to declare in the release notes this issue  
> and give the user guidance with the assurance this is being  
> addressed in 1.1 (or there abouts).
> Since there has been a lot of discussion about this already and it  
> being such a significant issue I thought I'd request a vote to see  
> where we stand.
> [ ] +1 Document issue in release notes and defer fix to 1.1
> [ ] 0  Not that important one way or another
> [ ] -1 This is an issue that must be resolved in the 1.0.x branch
> [ ] Other...provide your reasons.

View raw message