geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Mulder <ammul...@alumni.princeton.edu>
Subject Re: tranql needed for full build?
Date Mon, 06 Feb 2006 01:25:34 GMT
We haven't considered TranQL source necessary for quite a while.  The
only source that should be regularly checked out is OpenEJB, and we're
considering moving away even from that.

Thanks,
    Aaron

On 2/5/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> By "full build" I mean, the build that should just always work...
> latest stable development... if we had to release it, the same build
> that would be used for that.
>
> On a related note, why don't we use vendor branches for sources that
> are external to our SVN, but are critical for the build?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2006, at 5:01 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> > tranql and tranql-connector don't change all that often but if you
> > have them checked out you can build them as part of the project.
> > Similarly if you don't check out openejb you can use downloaded
> > jars.  Anytime you do this your risk of mismatched jars increases.
> >
> > So, it depends what you mean by "full build"
> >
> > thanks
> > david jencks
> >
> > On Feb 5, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> >
> >> Are the tranql sources needed for a full build?
> >>
> >> I noticed that new0 and new00 are both for tranql/* but m:checkout
> >> has the tranql co commented out.
> >>
> >> --jason
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message