geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <>
Subject Re: License issues with commonj
Date Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:45:37 GMT
My personal preference is to have all of our spec APIs available in  
source form from the geronimo-specs tree, so I'd much rather just  
type them in.


On Feb 2, 2006, at 2:07 AM, Andy Piper wrote:

> At 06:59 AM 2/2/2006, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> I've also discussed this issue regarding the lack of any  
>> recognizable license for their code w/ BEA and IBM, and they have  
>> made it very clear that they will provide one if needed.
>> So the question is, type or wait for license?  I say "type"
> I believe that it was never our intention that the java API should  
> be encumbered in a way that raises these issues and certainly not  
> our intention that people would have to type in the code from the  
> javadoc in order to circumvent the issues.
> My understanding was that we have already resolved this internally  
> (and hence why we are offering help in implementing the APIs), but  
> I will double check.
> Thanks
> andy

View raw message