geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: Migrating to maven 2 - conversion idea
Date Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:52:37 GMT
David Blevins wrote, On 2/14/2006 5:29 PM:
> 
> On Feb 14, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> 
>> On Feb 14, 2006, at 4:30 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 14, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is there an easy way to do this with m1?  I'm concerned about  
>>>> having two dependency lists: one in the project.xml and one in  the 
>>>> pom.xml.  Is there a tool that can merge the project.xml  
>>>> dependencies into a template pom.xml?
>>>
>>>
>>> If there was a tool we'd probably go from pom.xml to project.xml  for 
>>> transitive deps reasons rather than the other way around.
>>>
>>> But really, I wouldn't worry about having two deps lists.  Here is  
>>> an idea for keeping things working ...
>>>
>>> Why don't we:
>>>   - use an non-conflicting groupId like org.apache.geronimo-m2 or  
>>> something specifically for conversion
>>>   - set it up in our continuum install as another project
>>>   - and continuously build *both*
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> The reason for the new groupId is so that the m2 build doesn't  
>>> interfere at all with our regular m1 build.  We just won't sycn  
>>> org.apache.geronimo-m2.
>>>
>>> When our m2 build is read, we just drop the "-m2" suffix from the  
>>> groupId and delete the old maven.xml and project.xml files.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>> Take my comments with a large dose of salt since, I'm not  
>> volunteering to do the work....  I would like to see a module  
>> completely converted to m2 (one at a time) and stay converted.
> 
> 
> I think the continuum aspect would be the thing to ensure something  
> stays converted.  We could even do one at a time too, just that most  
> people (and the release process) would continue to rely on m1 till m2  
> conversion is completely done.
> 
>>   I get the impression that people are proposing that we create  
>> parallel builds for modules one at a time, and I just don't see  that 
>> working.
> 
> 
> Both the OpenEJB and ActiveMQ builds were done as parallel builds.   
> I've got ActiveMQ up in continuum building as an M2 projects, so we  
> know it stays good. Obviously, the OpenEJB build was done way before  we 
> had continuum and it got crufty.
> 
> ActiveMQ still does releases from m1 as they still don't have all  their 
> tests converted over.  Other than that their m2 build works.
> 
> But I'm in the same boat as you, I don't have the bandwidth to work  on 
> it aside from helping people get it running in continuum.

I feel the same way as Dain but I am willing to back it up w/ warm 
bodies to help.  Continuum will not help, imho.  It will only remind us 
how badly the two versions are drifting.


Regards,
Alan


Mime
View raw message